Disparities in Access to Neurologic Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Bronx Tale.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is a disparity in access to telemedical care that may be a function of socioeconomic status, language, or other demographic factors during the peak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic at a highly affected urban center (Montefiore Medical Center) in Bronx, NY. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated potential patient characteristics that might be associated with an increased likelihood of receiving a telephone visit as opposed to a televideo visit for patients followed in the pediatric neurology, adult epilepsy, and general neurology practices at Montefiore Medical Center during the 30-day period starting April 2, 2020, at the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in New York. RESULTS: We found that patients who had telephone encounters, as opposed to televideo encounters, were overall older, less likely to have commercial insurance, and more likely to have Medicaid. Among pediatric patients, a preferred language other than English was also associated with a higher proportion of telephone encounters. New patients in both the adult and pediatric groups were more likely to have televideo visits. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings identify demographic factors, including age, insurance type, and language preference, which may play a role in access to televideo encounters among neurology patients in an urban center during the COVID-19 pandemic. We suggest several potential practice, institution, and community-based interventions, which might further expand access to televideo care for neurology patients.

Seizure control, stress, and access to care during the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City: The patient perspective.

OBJECTIVE: Our epilepsy population recently experienced the acute effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City. Herein, we aimed to determine patient-perceived seizure control during the surge, specific variables associated with worsened seizures, the prevalence of specific barriers to care, and patient-perceived efficacy of epilepsy care delivered via telephone and live video visits during the pandemic. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional questionnaire study of adult epilepsy patients who had a scheduled appointment at a single urban Comprehensive Epilepsy Center (Montefiore Medical Center) between March 1, 2020 and May 31, 2020 during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Bronx. Subjects able to answer the questionnaire themselves in English or Spanish were eligible to complete a one-time survey via telephone or secure online platform (REDCap). RESULTS: Of 1212 subjects screened, 675 were eligible, and 177 adequately completed the questionnaire. During the COVID-19 pandemic, 75.1% of patients reported no change in seizure control, whereas 17.5% reported that their seizure control had worsened, and 7.3% reported improvement. Subjects who reported worsened seizure control had more frequent seizures at baseline, were more likely to identify stress and headaches/migraines as their typical seizure precipitants, and were significantly more likely to report increased stress related to the pandemic. Subjects with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 did not report worsened seizure control. Nearly 17% of subjects reported poorer epilepsy care, and 9.6% had difficulty obtaining their antiseizure medications; these subjects were significantly more likely to report worse seizure control. SIGNIFICANCE: Of the nearly 20% of subjects who reported worsened seizure control during the COVID-19 pandemic, stress and barriers to care appear to have posed the greatest challenge. This unprecedented pandemic exacerbated existing and created new barriers to epilepsy care, which must be addressed.

EEG findings in acutely ill patients investigated for SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19: A small case series preliminary report.

OBJECTIVE: Acute encephalopathy may occur in COVID-19-infected patients. We investigated whether medically indicated EEGs performed in acutely ill patients under investigation (PUIs) for COVID-19 report epileptiform abnormalities and whether these are more prevalent in COVID-19 positive than negative patients. METHODS: In this retrospective case series, adult COVID-19 inpatient PUIs underwent EEGs for acute encephalopathy and/or seizure-like events. PUIs had 8-channel headband EEGs (Ceribell; 20 COVID-19 positive, 6 COVID-19 negative); 2 more COVID-19 patients had routine EEGs. Overall, 26 Ceribell EEGs, 4 routine and 7 continuous EEG studies were reviewed. EEGs were interpreted by board-certified clinical neurophysiologists (n = 16). EEG findings were correlated with demographic data, clinical presentation and history, and medication usage. Fisher's exact test was used. RESULTS: We included 28 COVID-19 PUIs (30-83 years old), of whom 22 tested positive (63.6% males) and 6 tested negative (33.3% male). The most common indications for EEG, among COVID-19-positive vs COVID-19-negative patients, respectively, were new onset encephalopathy (68.2% vs 33.3%) and seizure-like events (14/22, 63.6%; 2/6, 33.3%), even among patients without prior history of seizures (11/17, 64.7%; 2/6, 33.3%). Sporadic epileptiform discharges (EDs) were present in 40.9% of COVID-19-positive and 16.7% of COVID-19-negative patients; frontal sharp waves were reported in 8/9 (88.9%) of COVID-19-positive patients with EDs and in 1/1 of COVID-19-negative patient with EDs. No electrographic seizures were captured, but 19/22 COVID-19-positive and 6/6 COVID-19-negative patients were given antiseizure medications and/or sedatives before the EEG. SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first preliminary report of EDs in the EEG of acutely ill COVID-19-positive patients with encephalopathy or suspected clinical seizures. EDs are relatively common in this cohort and typically appear as frontal sharp waves. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and evaluate the potential direct or indirect effects of COVID-19 on activating epileptic activity.

Importance of genetic testing in global health during the evaluation of familial microcephaly.

A focused genetic workup is useful in determining the cause of familial microcephaly, especially in the setting of mildly different phenotypes. As illustrated by this case from an impoverished international urban location, one must not assume the etiology for the apparent familial microcephaly is the same for all affected members.

Novel CLCN1 mutation in carbamazepine-responsive myotonia congenita.

Myotonia congenita is a nondystrophic muscle disorder characterized by muscle stiffness and muscle hypertrophy. The disorder can be inherited in an autosomal-dominant (Thomsen disease) or autosomal-recessive (Becker disease) manner. Both forms of myotonia congenita are attributable to mutations in the CLCN1 gene. Treatment with a variety of medications has led to long-term improvement in the clinical course of affected individuals. We describe a Honduran boy with myotonia congenita and a novel p.L287I mutation in the CLCN1 gene. The patient's unaffected father carries the same mutation, most likely reflecting autosomal-recessive myotonia congenita, with an inability to find a second mutation. The patient received carbamazepine treatment for 1 year, resulting in decreased muscle stiffness, increased strength, and improved quality of life in school and with peers.

Utilization of blood spot testing for metabolic-genetic disorders in Honduras: is it time for newborn screening?

Honduran infant mortality (20/1000) has fallen below the Latin American newborn screening target rate (<30/1000). The authors report 2 Honduran maple syrup urine disease cases and a newborn screening pilot study. The first infant, diagnosed by plasma/urine testing in the U.S., prompted this study. Although marked clinical/radiological improvement occurred after treatment, moderate neurodevelopmental delays persist at 5 years. This 1-month, prospective study used blood spot specimens from hospitalized term Honduran neonates shipped overnight to South Carolina for routine newborn screening with electronic result submission to Honduras for follow-up. Of 88 consecutive neonates (mean age: 4.2 days, standard deviation: 4.2 days) tested, 24 (0.6%) of 3837 completed tests were positive. Another infant with maple syrup urine disease, diagnosed after study completion by blood spot testing, later died. The study findings indicate that collaborative blood spot testing aids in the diagnosis of Honduran metabolic-genetic disease. Newborn screening is now needed to diagnose and treat these diseases before morbidity/mortality develops.